Showing posts with label hong-kong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hong-kong. Show all posts

Monday, 8 February 2010

european football: murders and bribes

The Hunt for The 'Doner Killer'

Mystery Murders May be Linked to Betting Scandal

14 december 2009

The investigation into match-fixing and illegal gambling in Europe has provided a lead in one of Germany's most mysterious series of murders in which nine men -- eight Turks and one Greek -- have been shot dead in cities across Germany since 2000. They may have run up gambling debts.

Police say they may have a lead in one of the most mysterious series of murders in German criminal history -- the execution-style killings of nine shop owners since 2000, eight of them Turks and one Greek.

They were shot dead in cities across Germany between 2000 and 2006. Police couldn't find a motive, and the only link they found between the murders was the weapon used -- a Czech-made Ceska 83 pistol with a 7.65 millimeter caliber.
The press dubbed the murders the "Doner Killings" because the victims were all small businessmen and included a kebab shop owner, a grocer, a tailor, a flower seller and a key cutter.

Police now believe the killings may be linked to the European soccer match-fixing and betting scandal uncovered by public prosecutors in Germany last month.

In October, police had monitored several telephone conversations about a murder in Turkey in which a 42-year-old Turk suspected of belonging to an illegal gambling syndicate was named as having hired the hitman.

Police say there's a link between the murder in Turkey and the nine killings. "The 42-year-old plays a role in this case," Thomas Koch, the spokesman for the Nuremberg district court, told SPIEGEL. He declined to give details.

Gambling Bosses Used Violence to Collect Debts

The link with the gambling world could finally provide a motive for murders which have puzzled police forces around Germany for years. Had the murdered men run up gambling debts?

The Bochum investigators have found that the people being probed for fixing matches and engaging in illegal gambling also behaved violently towards people who got behind in repaying gambling debts.

Police have no doubt that the "Doner Killings" were committed by a professional assassin. The attacker or attackers walked up to the victims in broad daylight, shot them in the head and walked away. There were never any eyewitnesses, and the relatives always insisted the victim had no enemies, debts or gambling addiction.

But perhaps they did. There's no paper trail in the world of gambling now being investigated by prosecutors based in the western city of Bochum. The gamblers know how much they owe and when they have to pay up. They can defer payments, but get charged interest of 10 percent per month. And anyone who can't pay is in bad trouble.

Police investigating the betting scandal came across debtors who reported having been locked in a cellar and beaten up because they couldn't pay.

The lawyer of the 42-year-old Turkish suspect told SPIEGEL that his client had nothing to do with the murders and that the accusations were based on slander that had long since been disproved.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

20 november 2009

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,662479,00.html

Football Betting Scandal

Prosecutors Say up to 200 Matches Were Fixed

Prosecutors in Germany have revealed the scope of the match-fixing scandal that has shocked European football. Around 200 games are suspected of having been fixed, with more than 30 of those played in Germany.

European football is reeling from news of a fresh match-fixing scandal involving nine countries and up to 200 games.

German prosecutors investigating the manipulation revealed on Friday that 15 people have been arrested in Germany and two in Switzerland. A series of around 50 raids were carried out on Thursday, during which documents, around €1 million in cash and valuables were seized.

At a news conference the prosecutors said that about 200 games were thought to be affected, including three Champions League games and 12 Europa League games. The investigation, carried out with the European football association UEFA, has been ongoing since the beginning of 2009.

The betting scandal involves huge sums of money placed with Asian bookmakers on matches in Europe and players, coaches, referees and officials are included among the suspects. In all around 100 people could be involved in the match-fixing conspiracy.

Fix On in Germany as Well?

Games in at least nine European leagues are being probed, including matches played in Germany, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia, Switzerland and Turkey.

On Thursday Harald Stenger, spokesman for the German Football Federation (DFB), said: "The UEFA and DFB early warning system for the overseeing of the betting markets had not given any indications of match-fixing in Germany."

However, on Friday the prosecutors said that 32 games in Germany alone are suspected of having been fixed. There are indications that four games in the second league, three from the third league and 18 from regional leagues are tainted, as well as matches in the youth leagues and international competitions.

Thursday's arrests included two Croatian brothers, Ante and Milan Sapina, who were at the center of a previous match-fixing scandal in Germany in 2004. That case saw referee Robert Hoyzer sentenced to two years and five months in prison after he admitted to accepting bribes to manipulate games.

smd

New German Betting Scandal Suspected: Football Bodies to Investigate Match-Fixing Claims (09/01/2008)

Interview with Match-Fixing Investigator Declan Hill: 'I Am Sure the Game Was Manipulated' (09/01/2008)

Soccer Scandals: UEFA Probes Match-Fixing by Betting Syndicates (12/03/2007)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The World from Berlin

Match-Fixing Scandal 'Struck at the Heart of Soccer'


The European match-fixing scandal is tragic for soccer fans whose faith in fair play risks being shattered, write German commentators. But corruption can infect any business, and the undercover police operation that exposed it is a positive sign, they add.

Last Friday's revelation of the latest European soccer match-fixing scandal predictably caused a public outcry that was fanned by investigators' claims that the figure of 200 manipulated matches may be only the tip of the iceberg.

Police carried out around 50 raids on Thursday in Germany, Britain, Switzerland and Austria. Authorities arrested 15 people in Germany and two in Switzerland and seized over €1 million ($1.5 million) in cash and property.

The case centers on a Berlin-based betting shop, Café King, which featured in a similar scandal five years ago that led to the conviction of German referee Robert Hoyzer.

The suspected games in Germany were played in the second division or lower. Other countries involved are Belgium, Switzerland, Croatia, Slovenia, Turkey, Hungary, Bosnia and Austria. Croatian-born Ante Sapina was among five people arrested in Berlin. He was convicted of fraud in 2005 and sentenced to 35 months in prison for fixing or attempting to fix 23 games by paying Hoyzer to rig matches.

SPIEGEL has learned that a German referee registered with the DFB German Football Association also appears to have been bribed, in a lower-division match played in May. The DFB was kept in the dark about the investigation into the alleged match fixing.

Meanwhile on Monday Italian police arrested nine people on suspicion of manipulating matches in the country's third division and betting illegally.

Writing in the Monday's editions of German newspapers, several media commentators said the case highlights the successful undercover investigation conducted by the public prosecutor's office in the western city of Bochum in cooperation with police forces in other countries over the last eight months. They were helped by members of the UEFA, the Union of European Football Associations, which founded an anti-corruption unit this year.

Commentators say the DFB's "early warning" system, which was introduced after the first scandal five years ago and which aims to detect corruption by analyzing conspicuous changes in betting odds, appears to have failed.

The left-wing Berliner Zeitung writes:

"There's no question that corruption poses an existential threat to football that is comparable to the destructive impact doping has had on endurance sports. The audience must not lose its faith that the outcome of the match is uncertain. It must remain convinced that skill and fortune alone are the determining factors, and not some shady backroom dealmakers.

"What the task force of UEFA and the prosecutors in Bochum who specialize in economic crime have presented is not a diagnosis. Instead, it's the promising result of a global attempt to solve the problem which seems to make more sense than the early warning system introduced in this country following the match-fixing scandal surrounding referee Robert Hoyzer. The effectiveness of that system must now be called into question.

"It seems that plots conducted in secret must be countered by secret means. Football, a billion-euro business with absurd growth rates, is an almost uncontrollable area due to the impenetrable links between sports officials, politicians, sponsors and the media.

"Following the American example, more cops must be deployed to infiltrate the dark network of fraudsters. And if the network of agents doesn't work, one should maybe one day think about a general ban on sports betting."

The center-left Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:

"At the news conference on Friday in Bochum, a police officer used the much-quoted image of the tip of the iceberg. But police officers aren't the Oracle of Delphi and a degree of caution is warranted in cases like this one. It's not such a big surprise that matches can be fixed in the second Belgian division or in the Balkans. The less a player earns, the greater the danger that he will do dodgy things for dirty money. It's rather more remarkable that the first German Bundesliga (editor's note: the top German soccer league) hasn't appeared on the list. Do high incomes, legally paid, protect players from infection?

"The Bochum investigators deserve praise. They haven't shied away in their investigations from probing the leagues in Belgium or Slovenia. If they're serious about their probe, they shouldn't be left alone in this never-ending task."

Franz Josef Wagner, a columnist for the mass-circulation daily Bild, writes:

"The match-fixing supposedly happened in the lower divisions. Players with mega-salaries in the first division can't be bought. So the cheating happened where the heart of soccer beats. The cheated fans are the ones who stand shivering on the sidelines in the wind, the cold and the rain. The ones who turn up every Sunday and yell things like 'go on, shoot!,' 'pass the ball,' 'what are you waiting for?' or 'my granny could have saved that one!'

"I feel sorry for those fans. It wasn't a lack of fighting spirit that kept your player from hurling himself at the opponent. It was a few euros. From today on, I'm taking a break from football. I don't want to be screwed anymore."

-- David Crossland

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

European Sports Scandal

Case Files Reveal Unscrupulous Methods of Match-Fixers

By Sven Röbel, Jörg Schmitt and Michael Wulzinger

Ante Sapina and his gambling associates, under investigation for alleged match-fixing, were also aware of an attempt to manipulate a World Cup qualifying match. The case files reveal the unscrupulous methods used by the defendants and indicate that a Malaysian gambling kingpin named Lim was also involved.

The match between FK Slavija Sarajevo and the Slovak club MFK Kosice on July 30 was nothing out of the ordinary in the match schedule of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA). It was just the third qualifying round for the Europa League, and only 1,400 fans watched the game.

But one man who was particularly interested in the match was not in the stadium: Ante Sapina, 33, the leader of a gambling ring operating out of Berlin's Café King. Sapina has a criminal record and was arrested last month on charges of being one of the ringleaders of an alleged gambling syndicate believed to have fixed at least 200 soccer matches across Europe. He is suspected of having fixed this match in Bosnia, too.

It was a perfidious plan that police in the western German city of Bochum uncovered in a covert investigation. With the help of a 22-year-old Swiss national and a 34-year-old Croat, Sapina is believed to have contacted a doctor working for FK Slavija Sarajevo before the match. The doctor was told to pay a €3,000 ($4,470) bribe to a cook at the hotel where the guest team, MFK Kosice, was staying. The cook's job was to stir drugs into the lunch of the Kosice players, drugs designed to reduce their performance, because Sapina was betting on a Sarajevo win.

The investigators are convinced that the cook accepted the bribe. However, they are unable to prove without a doubt, based on wiretapped telephone conversations, that the drugging actually took place. And even if it did, Sapina's bet wouldn't have paid off: MFK Kosice won the match 2-0.

'Manipulating the Game'

But the plan alone offers "insights into the structure of the perpetrators," who "unscrupulously ignored the dangers to completely non-involved professional football players." Sapina and his associates, the investigators noted, were "even pleased and amused by this new approach to manipulating the game."

A screenwriter working on a film about gambling syndicates couldn't have been more effective at conjuring up this episode from the shady world of European professional football, which is identified as Case File 10.10 in the investigative report. It shows how much criminal energy was behind the efforts by Sapina and his associates to fix football matches. Some of the defendants come from a background in which extortion, theft and assault appear to be part of everyday business -- men like Deniz C., a 30-year-old Turk who owns several nudist and sauna clubs in Germany's Ruhr region and is now behind bars.

The sheer scope of the alleged cases documents the obsession with which these gamblers pursued their fraudulent betting activities. The day after 15 suspects had been arrested in a nationwide series of raids, police said that about 200 matches in nine European countries were suspected of having been fixed. The number of countries involved has now increased to 17.

First Player Ready to Testify

Meanwhile, the first of the accused professional players is now willing to come clean. A former second division player and his attorney are scheduled to meet with prosecutors in Bochum in the next few days. The player is expected to report how members of the gambling syndicates made him dependent on them by granting him a six-figure loan. In return, his creditors are believed to have forced him to help them fix matches.

The case is growing by the day. Contrary to the claims of sports officials seeking to downplay the situation, the match-fixing activities of Sapina and his cohorts have not just affected matches in lower leagues, such as the Upper League South of the Northeast German Football Association or the Third Turkish League. Investigators have also set their sights on top-level events, where any evidence of match-fixing would be potentially devastating to this highly profitable entertainment industry. There is probably nothing more detrimental to business than the suspicion that matches could have been fixed.

According to investigators, one of the matches being looked at is the World Cup qualifying match between Bosnia-Herzegovina and Turkey on Sept. 9. They believe that an attempt was made to bribe the Bosnian coach with €500,000, so as to enable the Turks to achieve a "guaranteed victory." Sapina is believed to have known about the attempt to fix the match, but the coach apparently turned down the offer.

Investigators also believe that two matches in the second qualification round for the Champions League may have been fixed: both the first leg between FC Copenhagen and FK Mogren Budva on July 15 and the return match in Montenegro a week later. In both cases, the Danes won 6-0, and in both cases Marjia C., a Croat living in the southern German city of Nuremberg and one of the key defendants in the criminal investigation proceedings, is believed to have tried to bribe players and officials.

By the end of last week, prosecutors had not provided the attorneys with photocopies of the roughly 300-page investigative report -- apparently "for reasons relating to investigation tactics."

As a result, a defense attorney who was trying to determine what exactly the charges against his client were, was forced to travel to Bochum, to an office on the 11th floor of a building that houses the local judicial authorities. Andreas Bachmann, the public prosecutor conducting the investigation in the case, opened a secured glass door to allow his visitor to enter the office, but only after the visitor had entered the correct four-digit code at the entrance, and then led him to a small room furnished with a chair, two tables and a plain wooden shelf with 45 binders on it.


Malaysian Connection

Those binders contain the key documents in the case: an investigative report filed under reference number 35 Js 40/09, the case files on the individual defendants and telephone surveillance reports. The attorneys are prohibited from photocopying anything, although note pads and dictaphones are permitted.

The information in the documents is potentially explosive. For instance, one of Sapina's backers is believed to have been William Bee Wah Lim, a Malaysian who was supposed to "implement gambling interests among Asian gambling syndicates."

Lim is a colorful figure in the betting world. On June 1, 2007, a Frankfurt court convicted Lim of attempted match-fixing and sentenced him to two years and five months in prison. After proceedings that lasted more than a year, the betting kingpin confessed that he attempted to manipulate six matches in the German Second League and in regional leagues, as well as two matches in Austria's top league.

When they searched his confiscated computers, investigators with the Hesse State Office of Criminal Investigation found plenty of incriminating evidence that Lim had wagered millions of euros in the Asian betting market on matches in German professional football, matches that he had most likely manipulated. The most noticeable was a match between Hannover 96 and 1. FC Kaiserslautern on Nov. 26, 2005. Lim had bet €2.8 million ($4.2 million) on a Hannover victory.

How to Win €2.2 Million on a Match

The match, which Hannover won 5-1, made Lim €2.2 million. The match had hardly ended before Lim wrote the word "Beer" in an instant message via Skype to his agent in Asia, who had placed the bets for him. The agent replied: "Congrats!!!! Hehehe. Dance."

The 200 pages of records of Lim's Skype communications were not admitted as evidence in court because the public prosecutor's office felt that they were not sufficiently conclusive. Lim, a former cook who used multiple names, apparently had both a Chinese and a British passport and used various dates of birth in his documents, was released on bail of €40,000 before the end of his sentence. He fled Germany shortly after his release, and a warrant for his arrest was issued at the beginning of 2008. Lim's former defense attorney was on vacation last week and could not be reached for comment.

Now Lim has resurfaced. He is believed to have been in close contact with the Croat national Marjio C. from Nuremberg, who apparently ran the gambling ring together with Sapina. The defendant C., according to the files, described Lim as "his good friend." Investigators have not been able to pinpoint the fugitive Lim's whereabouts in Europe or Asia, and they have only managed to locate one of his accounts -- with a bank in the Swiss capital, Bern.

According to the documents, Sapina usually placed his bets on the Asian betting market through a brokerage firm in West London, where he was in touch with two employees, one of whom called himself Joseph Chang and the other Eric Ho. Both were part of the "China connection," which investigators believe includes Sapina's contacts in the Netherlands and Malaysia.

Accounts Around the Globe

Sapina's betting millions circle the globe, but they left no traces in German accounts. The betting mastermind from Café King had learned his lesson from the Hoyzer scandal. Sapina apparently had a man in Malaysia named Marc launder the illegal proceeds he is believed to have earned from fixed football matches. Investigators have discovered that this Marc withdrew the money from Sapina's betting accounts with two Asian betting operations, deposited it into accounts with the Bank of China in Hong Kong and Malaysia, and then transferred it back to England. Other defendants are believed to have circumvented the German tax authorities by having their illegal betting earnings transferred to accounts in Austria, Scotland, the Netherlands and Malta.

Ivan P., a German of Croatian origin who investigators believe acted as a "bookkeeper" of sorts for Sapina, was apparently one of the middlemen who allegedly transferred the betting proceeds abroad. They also accuse Ivan P., who is now under arrest, of having passed bribes to football players in five cases. Commenting on the charges, P.'s defense attorney Michael Tsambikakis told SPIEGEL: "Based on the information at my disposal to date, I cannot see that my client played a manipulative role in relation to a football match." Last Monday, Tsambikakis filed an appeal against the warrant for his client's arrest.

Meanwhile, criminal investigation specialists are trying to disentangle the international web of dubious monetary transactions. The investigators noted: "Based on the results of telecommunications surveillance, there is evidence of cash flows in the millions."

For a period lasting several weeks and ending in January 2009, investigators tracked down balances totaling about €3.5 million in five "Sapina accounts" in Asia. This spring, €721,500 was apparently deposited into another of Sapina's betting accounts over a period of six weeks to cover 17 bets. Contrary to his gambling nature, he invested his betting proceeds in foreign real estate, as investigators have discovered.

Football was apparently not the only sport Sapina and his associates bet on when "structuring matches according to their needs." According to the last few pages of the investigative report, investigators suspect that the gambling syndicate also manipulated a women's doubles match at a professional tennis tournament in Fes, Morocco. They also believe that Sapina tried to fix a game in the playoffs in Germany's national basketball league.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

German National Team Keeper Commits Suicide

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,660579,00.html

11/11/2009

Robert Enke
is dead. The 32-year-old national team player took his own life on Tuesday evening at a train crossing near Hanover, as his friend and advisor Jörg Neblung confirmed late Tuesday.

"I can confirm that it was a case of suicide. Robert killed himself just before 6 p.m.," Neblung said in a short statement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Enke

(...)
Enke returned to his homeland joining Bundesliga side Hannover 96 in July 2004 on a free transfer in an initial two year deal. His career enjoyed its greatest success and stability, as he became firmly established as the club's first choice and was voted the best goalkeeper in the league by his fellow professionals in Kicker magazine.
(...)

Senior career*

2004–2009 Hannover 96

(...)

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,575586,00.html

09/01/2008

Interview with Match-Fixing Investigator Declan Hill

'I Am Sure the Game Was Manipulated'

Canadian journalist Declan Hill spoke to SPIEGEL about his investigation into betting syndicates in Asia. He claims to have uncovered evidence that the result of the last-16 football match between Ghana and Brazil during the 2006 World Cup may have been fixed.

SPIEGEL: You have spent three years investigating the international betting mafia. Have you lost all pleasure in football?

Declan Hill: I love football the way one loves a woman, but by now I ask myself quite early on in a match, whether there is anything suspicious going on. There are no precise statistics about betting manipulation in football, of course, but it is shocking how often people in the world of betting talk about matches that have been manipulated – not just in Asia or Eastern Europe, but also in the major football leagues, such as in Germany, and even during world championships.

SPIEGEL: Is that something you would have expected?

Hill: Absolutely not, and that’s why I took plenty of time in the book to allow the reader to follow my own process of realisation. I still vividly remember standing at the edge of a dusty track after meeting an informer in Ghana, with the wind blowing down from the Sahara, thinking: This is just incredible.

SPIEGEL: In your book you say you think that the match between Brazil and Ghana in the round before the quarterfinals at the 2006 World Cup was fixed. The starting point for your investigation is an infamous Asian fixer. How did you meet him?

Hill: That was a drawn-out process that took months. In the Asian gambling world, every insider knows his name. He’s said to have been manipulating games for 15 years, his name turns up in the case files of match fixing in Asia. He organizes the bets and their manipulation. In my book I called him Lee Chin. In November 2005 he invited me to a golf club on the outskirts of Bangkok. The conversation that ensued over the next two and a quarter hours was one of the strangest I have ever had.

SPIEGEL: In what way?

Hill: He claimed he was a leading member of a syndicate that manipulated football matches. He said he had 16 runners, that is middle men who approach the players, coaches or referees. And all the time we were talking to each other, one of his two phones would keep ringing. One call came from the Philippines, where the Southeast Asian Games were taking place at the time. After the phone call he said he had made sure that Laos would only lose 0:1 to Singapore. Fine, manipulated games at Asian sporting events, that isn’t all that surprising, but then he claimed to manipulate games at other major sporting events.

SPIEGEL: Did he give examples?

Hill: He said he had been at the Olympic Games in Atlanta in 1996 and had seen to it that Tunisia lost the opening match against Portugal. He claimed that he approached a couple of the Tunisian players. They refused to take money from him, for religious reasons, so instead he alleges he sent them beautiful Mexican prostitutes. Tunisia lost 0:2. Lee Chin said: “I won a great deal of money and everyone was contented.”

SPIEGEL: Did you believe him?

Hill: That evening I was torn to and fro all the time. Just before the interview Thailand’s Prime Minister Thaksin publicly voiced the suspicion that many events at the Southeast Asian Games had been manipulated. As regards the 1996 Olympic Games, Chin’s assertions can hardly be verified any more. What is interesting is that finally, just before 10:30, one of Chin’s telephones rang once again. He spoke in some language which I did not understand. After the call he said the Bundesliga game between Hannover 96 and 1. FC Kaiserslautern, which was just about to begin a few thousand kilometers away, had been fixed. Naturally I had heard of the Hoyzer scandal in German football, but it nevertheless seemed incredible to me that this sort of thing should be possible in a major league in which the professionals earn so much money. He did not tell me who was purportedly on the take but the match ended with the result that he predicted and 10 days later is was publicly revealed that some matches in the South-East Asian Games had been fixed, and a number of players were imprisoned.

SPIEGEL: But why did Chin agree to meet you in the first place and tell you this kind of thing?

Hill: I asked myself the same question for a long time. Maybe because he wanted to prove to the world how good he is, and a book like this may have sounded tempting to him. Maybe he felt flattered by the fact that someone from such an alien world -- a journalist and academic from Oxford University -- took him seriously and treated him respectfully. Perhaps it also has to do with the fact that, thanks to my research into match-fixing, I spoke his language.

SPIEGEL: He wanted you to recognize his art?

Hill: I think so.

SPIEGEL: He is a gambler, did he play with you too?

Hill: Perhaps.

SPIEGEL: Why do you safeguard his identity and refrain from using his real name in your book?

Hill: Because he would kill me.

SPIEGEL: Really?

Hill: I know I’m playing with fire, but there is a limit to my courage and heroism. I was often warned before interviews to leave the subject alone. Two journalists, Johnson Fernandez and Lazarus Rokk, who exposed match fixing in Malaysia some years ago, were sent a fake bullet bearing the sign “the next one is for real.”

SPIEGEL: Chin then offered to allow you to witness him fixing a match during the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany. That sounds like a cock-and-bull story.

Hill: Yes, but that’s what happened.

SPIEGEL: How exactly did he go about it?

Hill: After our first meeting in November 2005 I stayed in touch with him. He then reported about the preparations and the name of one country was mentioned very often: Ghana. He told me that people from his syndicate had already been in touch with a few of Ghana’s players during the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens and that he had succeeded at the time in getting Ghana to lose the final match against Japan. He claimed contacts existed now and that things would go ahead. Then, on 25 May 2006, he told me to come to a Kentucky Fried Chicken branch in a shopping center in the north of Bangkok. I was to witness the deal being negotiated. Why was I allowed to be present? No idea. I sometimes got the feeling that Chin viewed my skepticism as a personal affront.

SPIEGEL: What happened there?

Hill: When I entered, four men were sitting at a table: Chin, next to him two younger Chinese, and a black guy, a large, athletic man in a blue shirt and blue jeans. I sat down a few tables further along, I was rather nervous, my hidden camera wasn’t working, instead I tried to take a photograph with my mobile phone. The black man was supposed to be a runner, the middle man for the Ghanaian team. Chin said that the man claimed he had access to a number of players and officials from his country but that he needed an initial down payment in order to secure the team’s trust. The meeting lasted a little over an hour. Later Chin phoned me and was jubilant.

SPIEGEL: Did you know who the black man was?

Hill: Chin told me that in his office, two days after the meeting. He said he was a coach for Ghana’s under 17s team, someone who knew his way around Ghanaian football. Chin said the man had obtained the consent of eight of Ghana’s players. A few days earlier I had read in the newspaper that Ghana’s team would receive $20,000 for each victory at the Word Cup. I asked Chin whether that wouldn’t be more important to Ghana’s players. He replied: “But a victory is not 100 percent certain. And each player is guaranteed to receive $30,000 from me. Get it?” And at the end of our conversation he asked me whether I had taken a photograph in the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant. “I was able to see you,” he said. “I know you tried to take a picture. I know. I know everything.”

SPIEGEL: Did he threaten you?

Hill: No, but I felt very uneasy, after all I was recording this conversation too. After that I realized I had to be more careful.

SPIEGEL: You then flew straight to the World Cup in Germany?

Hill: I watched Ghana’s first game against Italy in my flat in Oxford. Incidentally, Chin had predicted that Italy would win by at least two goals. Italy won 2:0, the performance of the Ghanaian team felt very strange, they seemed to play well but I thought there was something odd. Even before the final whistle I jotted down my opinion on a slip of paper: This game was manipulated. Now to this day, I do not know if that is true or not, but I flew to Germany where I booked into the Hotel Maritim, where the Ghana team was staying in Würzburg, to find out.

SPIEGEL: Was that easy to do?

Hill: Interestingly enough, it was. Anyone who wanted to could get up close to the Ghanaian players. During the six days I was there, I was in touch with almost all the players, coaches and officials. No problem. Of course I looked around for the Ghanaian runner, the man from the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant in Bangkok, but I never saw him. It was very sociable in the hotel, and superficially everything seemed to be in order, no sign of the runner, no Asians hanging around. Two days before the match against Brazil in the round of 16, Chin called and said that the deal with someone in the Ghana camp was on, 100 percent, he said. He was absolutely certain Ghana would lose by at least two goals.

SPIEGEL: June 27, 2006, the match ended 3:0 for Brazil.

Hill: The Ghanaians played as though they were putting their whole heart into it, but then there were a number of stupid mistakes: passes didn’t succeed, the defense was careless, the team collected three stupid goals. After the game I was in the stands in Dortmund with tears in my eyes because I was convinced, at least emotionally, that the match had been fixed. I phoned Chin from the stadium: “I didn’t believe you, but you are a genius.” He said: “How can I be a genius if I earn so little money with this?”

SPIEGEL: What did you do in order to find out whether your feelings weren’t misleading you?

Hill: After the World Cup I first of all had to finish writing my dissertation in Oxford but in the summer of 2007 I flew to Ghana to find the runner. A crazy plan really, but if there was anyone who could confirm Chin’s stories then it was that runner.

SPIEGEL: How did you find him?

Hill: By chance. While I was in Ghana, Ghana’s under-23 team played Iran. After the game there were reports that someone had tried to fix the game, one of the coaches was dismissed from the team. A newspaper printed a photograph of the coach: it was the man from the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant. His name is Abukari Damba.

SPIEGEL: And then you met him?

Hill: Yes, four times in all. The first time was in a bar called the Bus Stop, and after that in the Beverly Hills Hotel both places in Accra. Damba had been one of the goalkeepers in the great Ghanaian team surrounding Abédi Pelé in the 1990s. Later he played in Malaysia and met a Malaysian match fixer there. He had been the under-17s coach for Ghana and for a short time an assistant coach of the under-23 team. At a hearing by the Ghanaian association about the attempted fixed match against Iran, Damba confessed to having put players from the team in touch with the two Asians and an Iranian, and to have received money in return.

SPIEGEL: And what did Damba say about the World Cup match between Ghana and Brazil?

Hill: He had also been in Würzburg with the same match fixer from Malaysia, where they had stayed in a hotel opposite the Ghanaian team quarters, and Damba also admitted that he had gotten the Malaysian access to the team and that the match fixer also approached the team captain Steven Appiah.

SPIEGEL: And?

Hill: Damba says that he doesn’t know what happened after that.

SPIEGEL: Did you speak with Appiah about the accusations?

Hill: Not just with Appiah, but also with the goalkeeper Richard Kingson and other national players too. They all assured me that they were completely unaware of any possible manipulation of the team in Germany. However one of the players did admit that he had been approached by Asian betters in 2004 during the Olympic Games. And they all said that Appiah was the captain of the team and that I should to talk to him. I met with him in an industrial area in Accra. We talked in his car and he said that he had been approached a number of times in the course of his career and that he had taken money too. The first time was in 1997 during the under-17s World Cup in Malaysia and also in 2004 at the Olympic Games in Athens; however he had been given money in order to win games, not to lose them. He claimed that he then shared the bonus among all the players.

SPIEGEL: Ghana’s team captain, who was until recently signed up to Fenerbahce Istanbul, says that he accepted money from outside agents?

Hill: That’s exactly what he said. I wanted to confirm this, so I spoke to him again over the phone, and he repeated his account.

SPIEGEL: And during the 2006 World Cup in Germany?

Hill: He was approached there too, but he says that he refused. I also asked him whether the Malaysian had gone to other teams too. He replied: “Yes, I think he did the rounds.”

SPIEGEL: But you don’t know which of Ghana’s players might have been involved?

Hill: No, but I am nevertheless sure that the game was manipulated. Once again: there is an Asian betting manipulator, Lee Chin, who announces that he will fix a game during the World Cup. He allows me to witness a preparatory meeting at a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant in Bangkok. This meeting is attended by the former Ghanaian national player Abukari Damba and a match fixer from Malaysia. The two of them travel to Germany and approach players. And the match ends as predicted by Chin.

SPIEGEL: But does a player want to deliberately lose the round of 16 match at the Football World Cup, and into the bargain against the world champions from Brazil, which could make him famous?

Hill: In Ghana making it into the last 16 was already considered a huge success. After the victories against the Czech Republic and the United States, they were celebrated as heroes -- and after their defeat by Brazil too. Besides, there had been a huge argument within the Ghanaian delegation a week before the start of the World Cup. It was about the payment of the players, the functionaries wanted to use the money paid by FIFA mainly for advancing football. But the players suspected the officials of wanting to put it into their own pockets. They wanted to be paid well and were in quite a bad mood. However, I want to stress that not all the Ghana players were involved. Many were trying as hard as they could to win the match.

SPIEGEL: Ghanaian football is known for its corruption scandals, games in the Ghanaian premier league are fixed, last year the club of football hero Abédi Pele made it into the first league, they needed to win by a large margin and, somehow, the match ended 31:0. But how strong is the influence of Asian manipulators on games in Europe?

Hill: The Asians are only just discovering how excellently manipulation works here too. They still lack direct access in Europe. Europeans take care of that because they know the football players who are susceptible. They know who is corrupt and pass on their knowledge to the Asians.

SPIEGEL: Have you informed the world football association FIFA of your findings?

Hill: I visited Joseph Blatter in Zürich and told him that an Asian fixer had told me the outcomes of matches before they were played in the 2006 World Cup. He did not believe this to be true. If it had happened, he said, then it had not affected the overall outcome. But if it were true “then all the work done by FIFA during the past 30 years was in vain. In that case, we have failed.”

SPIEGEL: Could one say that the betting ring leader Ante Sapina, who bribed the referee Robert Hoyzer in the most well-known German case to date, is more a sort of pre-industrial gambler?

Hill: If he had joined forces with the Asians no one would ever have got onto him. Hoyzer and the Sapina brothers were really primitive in their methods.

Interview conducted by Christoph Biermann and Michael Wulzinger.

Saturday, 9 January 2010

grippe a: l'oms laquais des "pharmaciens"

.

source: réseau Voltaire

http://www.voltairenet.org/article163315.html

OMS : le « pape de la grippe A » accusé de corruption


par F. William Engdahl

16 décembre 2009

On le surnomme « Dr Flu » (Docteur Grippe), le professeur Albert Osterhaus est le principal conseiller de l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé face à la pandémie de grippe H1N1. Depuis plusieurs années, il prédit l’imminence d’une pandémie globale et ce qui se passe aujourd’hui semble lui donner raison.
Cependant, le scandale qui a éclaté aux Pays-Bas et fait l’objet d’un débat au Parlement a mis en évidence ses liens personnels avec les laboratoires fabriquant les vaccins qu’il fait prescrire par l’OMS.
F. William Engdhal relate comment un expert peu scrupuleux a pu manipuler l’opinion publique internationale, surévaluer l’impact de la grippe H1N1, et faire la fortune des laboratoires qui l’emploient.

Dans le courant de cette année, le Parlement néerlandais [1] nourrissait des soupçons à l’encontre du fameux Dr Osterhaus et avait ouvert une enquête pour conflit d’intérêts et malversations. Hors des Pays-Bas et des médias néerlandais, seules quelques lignes dans la très respectée revue britannique Science firent mention de l’enquête sensationnelle sur les affaires d’Osterhaus.

Ni les références, ni l’expertise d’Osterhaus dans son domaine n’étaient remises en question. Ce qui est mis en cause, comme nous l’apprend la revue Science dans une simple dépêche, c’est l’indépendance de son jugement personnel en matière de pandémie de grippe A. Science publiait ces quelques lignes à propos d’Osterhaus dans son édition du 16 octobre 2009 :

« Aux Pays-Bas, ces six derniers mois, il était difficile d’allumer sa télévision sans voir apparaître le célèbre chasseur de virus Albert Osterhaus et l’entendre parler de la pandémie de grippe A. Du moins, c’est ce que l’on croyait. Monsieur Grippe, c’était Osterhaus, le directeur d’un laboratoire de réputation internationale au sein du Centre médical de l’Université Érasme de Rotterdam. Mais, la semaine dernière, sa réputation est descendue en flamme après que des soupçons ont été émis sur sa velléité d’attiser les craintes d’une pandémie dans le but de servir les intérêts de son propre laboratoire dans la mise au point de nouveaux vaccins. Au moment où Science mettait sous presse, la Deuxième Chambre du Parlement néerlandais annonçait même que la question serait débattue en urgence. » [2]

Le 3 novembre 2009, sans pour autant en sortir indemne, Osterhaus avait su éviter les dégâts. Sur le site de Science, on pouvait lire dans l’un des blogs : « La Deuxième Chambre du Parlement néerlandais a aujourd’hui rejeté une motion exigeant que le gouvernement rompe tout lien avec le virologiste Albert Osterhaus du Centre médical de l’Université Erasmus de Rotterdam, qui fait l’objet d’une mise en accusation pour conflit d’intérêts en tant que conseiller gouvernemental. De son côté, le Ministre de la Santé Ab Klink annonçait dans le même temps une loi [3] pour la transparence du financement de la recherche, contraignant les scientifiques à révéler les liens financiers qu’ils entretiennent avec des entreprises privées. » [4]

Dans un communiqué sur le site Internet du Ministère de la Santé, M. Klink, dont on sait qu’il compte parmi les amis personnels d’Osterhaus [5], affirmait par la suite que ce dernier n’était qu’un conseiller du Ministère parmi de nombreux autres sur les questions des vaccins contre la grippe A H1N1. Il s’est aussi dit « au courant » des intérêts financiers d’Osterhaus [6] : ils ne cachent rien d’extraordinaire, simplement le progrès de la science et de la santé publique. Du moins, c’est ce qu’on croyait.

Un examen plus poussé du dossier Osterhaus laisse entrevoir que ce virologiste néerlandais à la renommée internationale pourrait se trouver au centre d’une arnaque mettant en jeu plusieurs milliards d’euros autour de l’idée d’une pandémie. Un système frauduleux dans lequel des vaccins non-testés sont injectés à des humains, au risque —cela c’est déjà produit— de provoquer de sévères séquelles, de graves paralysies, voire des décès.

La supercherie des fèces d’oiseau

Albert Osterhaus n’est pas du menu fretin. Il a joué un rôle dans toutes les grandes paniques suscitées par l’apparition de virus, depuis les mystérieux décès imputés au SRAS (Syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère) à Hong-Kong, là où l’actuelle Directrice générale de l’OMS Margaret Chan avait lancé sa carrière de responsable de la Santé Publique au niveau local. D’après sa biographie officielle à la Commission Européenne, en avril 2003, au paroxysme de la panique provoquée par le SRAS, Osterhaus fut engagé pour participer aux enquêtes sur les cas d’infections respiratoires qui se multipliaient alors à Hong Kong. On peut lire ces mots dans le rapport de l’Union Européenne : « il démontra à nouveau son talent à réagir rapidement à de graves situations. En trois semaines, il a prouvé que cette maladie est provoquée par un coronavirus récemment découvert qui contamine les civettes, les chauves-souris et d’autres animaux carnivores. » [7]

Par la suite, quand les cas de SRAS ne firent plus parler d’eux, Osterhaus passa à autre chose, œuvrant cette fois pour la médiatisation des dangers de ce qu’il nommait la grippe aviaire H5N1. En 1997 il avait déjà sonné l’alarme après la mort, à Hong Kong, d’un enfant de trois ans qu’Osterhaus savait avoir été en contact avec des oiseaux. Osterhaus développa son lobbying à travers les Pays-Bas et l’Europe, affirmant qu’une nouvelle mutation létale de la grippe aviaire s’était transmise aux humains et que des mesures drastiques devaient être prises. Il revendiquait être le premier scientifique au monde à avoir montré que le virus H5N1 pouvait contaminer des humains. [8]

Evoquant la dangerosité de la grippe aviaire dans une interview diffusée sur la BBC en octobre 2005, Osterhaus déclarait : « si le virus réussissait effectivement à muter de telle sorte qu’il se transmette ensuite entre humains, alors nous serions dans une situation complètement différente : nous pourrions nous trouver devant un début de pandémie. » .Il ajoutait : « il y a un vrai risque que le virus soit disséminé par les oiseaux dans toute l’Europe. C’est un risque réel que personne n’a pourtant pu évaluer jusqu’à présent, parce que nous n’avons pas mené les expérimentations. » [9] Le virus n’a jamais réussi sa mutation, mais Osterhaus était prêt à « mener des expérimentations » que l’on peut imaginer largement rétribuées.

Pour appuyer son alarmant scénario de pandémie en tentant de lui donner une légitimité scientifique, Osterhaus et ses assistants en poste à Rotterdam commencèrent à collecter et congeler des échantillons de fèces d’oiseaux. Il affirma que, selon les périodes de l’année, jusqu’à 30 % de tous les oiseaux d’Europe s’avéraient transporter le virus mortel de la grippe aviaire H5N1. Il affirma également que les éleveurs en contact avec des poules et des poulets se trouvaient alors exposés au dit virus. Osterhaus briefa les journalistes qui prirent bonne note de son message alarmiste. La classe politique fut mise en alerte. Dans la presse, il émit l’hypothèse selon laquelle le virus, qu’il étiquetait H5N1, après avoir provoqué plusieurs décès aux antipodes asiatiques, allait se propager en Europe, vraisemblablement transporté sur les plumes ou dans les entrailles d’oiseaux mortellement infectés. Il soutenait la thèse d’oiseaux migrateurs capables d’apporter le nouveau virus mortel vers l’ouest aussi loin qu’en Ukraine et sur l’île de Rügen [10]. Il lui suffit pour cela de feindre d’ignorer que les oiseaux ne migrent pas d’est en ouest mais bien du nord vers le sud.

La campagne alarmiste d’Osterhaus autour de la grippe aviaire décolla réellement en 2003, lorsqu’un vétérinaire néerlandais trouva la mort après avoir été malade. Osterhaus annonça que sa mort résultait d’une contamination par le virus H5N1. Il convainquit le Parlement néerlandais d’exiger l’abattage de millions de poulets. Pourtant, aucune autre personne ne succomba à une infection similaire à celle attribuée au H5N1. Pour Osterhaus, cela démontrait l’efficacité de la campagne d’abattage préventif. [11]

Pour Osterhaus, les déjections aviaires propageaient le virus en retombant sur les populations et les autres oiseaux au sol. Il était ferme dans sa conviction que ces déjections constituaient le vecteur de propagation de la nouvelle poussée mortelle du virus H5N1 depuis l’Asie.

Un problème se posait cependant avec le stock grandissant d’échantillons congelés des déjections aviaires que lui et ses associés avaient rassemblés et conservés dans son institut. La présence du virus H5N1 ne put être confirmée dans un seul de ces échantillons. En 2006, à l’occasion du congrès de l’OIE (Office international des épizooties, désormais appelé Organisation mondiale de la santé animale), Osterhaus et ses collègues à l’Université Érasme furent forcés d’admettre qu’en testant les 100 000 échantillons de matières fécales rassemblés avec tant de précaution, ils n’avaient découvert aucune trace du virus H5N1. [12]

En 2008, à Vérone, lors de la conférence de l’OMS intitulée « La grippe aviaire à l’interface Homme-Animal », Osterhaus prenait la parole devant ses collègues scientifiques, sans doute moins échauffés que le public non-scientifique par ses incitations à l’émotivité. Il admettait que : « dans l’état actuel des connaissances, rien ne permet[tait] de formuler une mise en garde contre le virus H5N1, ni d’affirmer qu’il puisse provoquer une pandémie. » [13] Mais, à ce moment-là, son regard se portait déjà fixement sur d’autres gâchettes à actionner pour faire converger son travail sur les vaccins avec de nouvelles possibilités de crise pandémique.

JPEG - 22.7 ko
En 1923, Louis Jouvet met en scène "Knock ou le triomphe de la médecine" de Jules Romain. Un médecin peu scrupuleux s’installe dans une petite ville et parvient à en convaincre les habitants qu’ils sont tous malades. Il leur prescrit des traitements inutiles, coûteux, et parfois dangereux. La pièce est portée à l’écran en 1933. L’escroc y dit la célèbre réplique : « Les gens bien portants sont des malades qui s’ignorent. »

Grippe A et corruption à l’OMS

Constatant que la grippe aviaire n’avait fait surgir aucune vague meurtrière de grande ampleur —et après que Roche, qui produit le Tamiflu, et GlaxoSmithKline, qui produit le Relenza, eurent encaissé des milliards de dollars de profits quand les gouvernement ont décidé de stocker des vaccins antiviraux contestés—, Osterhaus et les autres conseillers pour l’OMS se tournèrent vers de plus verts pâturages.

En avril 2009, leurs recherches semblaient couronnées de succès lorsqu’à La Gloria, un petit village mexicain de l’État du Veracruz, un enfant malade fut diagnostiqué comme porteur de la grippe alors dite « porcine » ou H1N1. Avec un empressement déplacé, l’appareil propagandiste de l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé à Genève fut lancé sur les chapeaux de roues avec les déclarations de son Directeur Général, le Docteur Margaret Chan, concernant l’éventuelle menace d’une pandémie mondiale.

Mme Chan évoqua « l’urgence de santé publique d’envergure internationale » [14] Par la suite, d’autres cas déclarés à La Gloria furent présentés sur un site Internet médical comme : une « étrange » poussée d’infections pulmonaires et respiratoires aiguës, qui évoluent en broncho-pneumonie dans certains cas rencontrés chez des enfants. Un habitant du village en décrivait les symptômes : « fièvres, toux sévères et sécrétions nasales très importantes » [15]

Ces symptômes prennent par contre tout leur sens dans le contexte environnemental de La Gloria, une des zones au monde qui concentrent le plus grand nombre de porcs en élevage intensif, dont les exploitations sont principalement détenues par l’américain Smithfield. Depuis des mois, la population locale manifestait devant le siège mexicain du groupe Smithfield, se plaignant de graves affections respiratoires dues aux lisiers de porc. Cette cause plausible pour les diverses maladies diagnostiquées à La Gloria ne sembla intéresser ni Osterhaus ni les autres conseillers de l’OMS. Enfin se profilait la pandémie tant attendue, celle qu’il avait prédite dès 2003, lors de sa participation aux recherches sur le SRAS dans la province de Guandgong en Chine.

Le 11 juin 2009, Margaret Chan annonçait que la propagation du virus de la grippe H1N1 avait atteint le niveau 6 de l’« urgence pandémique ». Curieusement, elle précisait lors de cette annonce que « selon les informations disponibles à ce jour, une majorité écrasante de patients ressentent des symptômes bénins ; leur rétablissement est rapide et complet, le plus souvent en ne recourant à aucun traitement médical. » Avant d’ajouter : « Au niveau mondial, le nombre de décès est peu important, nous ne nous attendons pas à voir une poussée soudaine et spectaculaire du nombre des infections graves ou mortelles. »

On apprenait plus tard que Chan avait agi à la suite de débats fiévreux à l’OMS, sur les conseils du Groupe stratégique consultatif d’experts de l’OMS (SAGE, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts). L’un des membres du SAGE, à l’époque et encore aujourd’hui, est notre « Monsieur Grippe », le docteur Albert Osterhaus.

Osterhaus occupait non seulement une position stratégique pour recommander à l’OMS de déclarer l’« urgence pandémique » et inciter à la panique, mais il était aussi le président d’une organisation en première ligne sur le sujet, le Groupe de travail scientifique européen sur la grippe (ESWI, European Scientific Working group on Influenza), qui se définit comme un « groupe multidisciplinaire de leaders d’opinion sur la grippe, dont le but est de lutter contre les répercussions d’une épidémie ou d’une pandémie grippales » Comme ses membres l’expliquent eux-mêmes, l’ESWI mené par Osterhaus est le pivot central « entre l’OMS à Genève, l’Institut Robert Koch à Berlin et l’Université du Connecticut aux États-Unis. »

Le plus significatif au sujet de l’ESWI est que son travail est entièrement financé par les mêmes laboratoires pharmaceutiques qui gagnent des milliards grâce à l’urgence pandémique, tandis que les annonces faites par l’OMS obligent les gouvernements du monde entier à acheter et stocker des vaccins. L’ESWI reçoit des financements des fabricants et des distributeurs de vaccins contre le H1N1, tels que Baxter Vaccins, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur et d’autres, dont Novartis, qui produit le vaccin et le distributeur du Tamiflu, Hofmann-La Roche.

Pour garder l’avantage, Albert Osterhaus, le plus grand virologiste mondial, conseiller officiel sur le virus H1N1 des gouvernements britannique et néerlandais et chef du Département de Virologie du Centre médical de l’Université Érasme, siégeait à la fois parmi l’élite de l’OMS réunie dans le groupe SAGE et présidait l’ESWI, parrainé par l’industrie pharmaceutique. À son tour, l’ESWI recommanda des mesures extraordinaires pour vacciner le monde entier, considérant comme élevé le risque d’une nouvelle pandémie qui, disait-on avec insistance, pourrait être comparable à l’effrayante pandémie de grippe espagnole de 1918.

La banque JP Morgan, présente à Wall Street, estimait que, principalement grâce à l’alerte pandémique lancée par l’OMS, les grands industriels pharmaceutiques, qui financent également le travail de l’ESWI d’Osterhaus, étaient prêts à engranger 7,5 à 10 milliards de dollars de bénéfices. [16]

Le docteur Frederick Hayden est à la fois membre du SAGE à l’OMS et du Wellcome Trust à Londres ; il compte notamment parmi les proches amis d’Osterhaus. Au titre de services « consultatifs », Hayden reçoit par ailleurs des fonds de la part de Roche et de GlaxoSmithKline parmi d’autres géants pharmaceutiques engagés dans la production de produits liés à la crise du H1N1.

Un autre scientifique britannique, le professeur David Salisbury, qui dépend du ministère britannique de la Santé, est à la tête du SAGE à l’OMS. Il dirige également le Groupe consultatif sur le H1N1 à l’OMS. Salisbury est un fervent défenseur de l’industrie pharmaceutique. Au Royaume-Uni, le groupe de défense de la santé One Click l’a accusé de dissimuler la corrélation avérée entre les vaccins et la montée en flèche de l’autisme chez l’enfant, ainsi que celle existant entre le vaccin Gardasil et des cas de paralysie et même de décès. [17]

Le 28 septembre 2009, le même Salisbury déclarait : « la communauté scientifique s’accorde sur l’absence totale de risque concernant l’inoculation du Thimérosal (ou Thiomersal). » Ce vaccin, utilisé contre le H1N1 en Grande-Bretagne, est principalement produit par GlaxoSmithKlilne. Il contient du Thimérosal, un conservateur à base de mercure. En 1999, de plus en plus de preuves faisant état que le Thimérosal présent dans les vaccins pourrait être la cause de cas d’autisme chez l’enfant aux États-Unis, l’American Academy of Pediatrics (Académie américaine de pédiatrie) et le Public Health Service (Bureau de la santé publique) avaient exigé son retrait de la composition des vaccins. [18]

On trouve encore un autre membre de l’OMS partageant d’étroits liens financiers avec les fabricants de vaccins qui profitent des recommandations du SAGE, en la personne du docteur Arnold Monto, un consultant rémunéré par les fabricants de vaccins MedImmune, Glaxo et ViroPharma.

Pire encore, participent aux réunions de scientifiques « indépendants » du SAGE, des « observateurs » comprenant, et oui, les mêmes producteurs de vaccins GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Baxter et consort. On peut se demander, si les meilleurs experts de la grippe au monde sont censés composer le SAGE, pourquoi invitent-ils les fabricants de vaccins à y participer ?

Au cours de la dernière décennie, l’OMS mettait en place ce que l’on nomme des « partenariats public/privé », dans le but d’accroître les fonds à sa disposition. Mais, plutôt que de recevoir des fonds provenant uniquement des gouvernements des pays membres de l’ONU, comme cela était prévu à l’origine, l’OMS reçoit à l’heure actuelle de la part des entreprises privées près du double du budget habituellement alloué par l’ONU sous forme de bourses et d’aides financières. De quelles entreprises privées ? Des mêmes fabricants de vaccins et de médicaments qui profitent des décisions officielles telles que celle prise en juin 2009 à propos de l’urgence pandémique de la grippe H1N1. Tout comme les bienfaiteurs de l’OMS, les grands laboratoires ont tout naturellement leurs entrées à Genève, et ont droit à un traitement fait de « portes ouvertes et de tapis rouges » [19].

Dans une interview donnée au magazine allemand Der Spiegel, un membre de la Cochrane Collaboration, une organisation de scientifiques indépendants qui évaluent toutes les études menées sur la grippe, l’épidémiologiste Tom Jefferson montrait les conséquences de la privatisation de l’OMS et la marchandisation de la santé.

« T. Jefferson : […] l’une des caractéristiques les plus ahurissantes de cette grippe, et de tout le roman-feuilleton qui en a découlé, est que, année après année, des gens émettent des prévisions de plus en plus pessimistes. Jusqu’à présent, aucune ne s’est jamais réalisée et ces personnes sont toujours là à répéter leurs prédictions. Par exemple, qu’est-il arrivé avec la grippe aviaire qui était censée tous nous tuer ? Rien. Mais, ce n’est pas cela qui arrête ces gens de faire leurs prédictions. Parfois, on a le sentiment que c’est toute une industrie qui se prête à espérer une pandémie.
Der Spiegel : De qui parlez-vous ? De l’OMS ?
T. J : L’OMS et les responsables de la santé publique, les virologistes et les laboratoires pharmaceutiques. Ils ont construit tout un système autour de l’imminence de la pandémie. Beaucoup d’argent est en jeu, ainsi que des réseaux d’influence, des carrières et des institutions tout entières ! Et il a suffit qu’un des virus de la grippe mute pour voir toute la machine se mettre en branle. »
[20]

Lorsqu’on lui a demandé si l’OMS avait délibérément déclaré l’urgence pandémique dans le but de créer un immense marché pour les vaccins et les médicaments contre le H1N1, Jefferson a répondu :

« Ne trouvez-vous pas frappant que l’OMS ait modifié sa définition de la pandémie ? L’ancienne définition parlait d’un virus nouveau, à propagation rapide, pour lequel l’immunité n’existe pas, et qui entraîne un taux élevé de malades et de décès. Aujourd’hui, ces deux derniers points sur les taux d’infection ont été supprimés, et c’est ainsi que la grippe A est entrée dans la catégorie des pandémies. » [21]

Très judicieusement, l’OMS publiait en avril 2009 la nouvelle définition de la pandémie, juste à temps pour permettre à l’OMS, sur les conseils émanant, entre autres, du SAGE, de « Monsieur Grippe », alias Albert Osterhaus, et de David Salisbury, de qualifier d’urgence pandémique des cas bénins de grippe, rebaptisée grippe A H1N1. [22]

Le 8 décembre 2009, dans la note en bas de page pertinente d’un article sur la gravité ou la bénignité de la « pandémie mondiale » du H1N1, le Washington Post mentionnait que : « la deuxième vague d’infection du H1N1 étant parvenue à son apogée aux États-Unis, les principaux épidémiologistes prévoient que la pandémie pourrait compter parmi les plus bénignes depuis que la médecine moderne documente les épidémies de grippe. » [23]

Igor Barinov, parlementaire russe et président du Comité pour la Santé à la Douma, a exigé des représentants russes à l’OMS en poste à Genève qu’ils diligentent une enquête officielle sur les indices multiples de la corruption massive acceptée par l’OMS et menée par l’industrie pharmaceutique. « De graves accusations de corruption sont prononcées à l’encontre de l’OMS », affirmait Barinov. « Une commission internationale d’enquête doit s’organiser au plus vite. » [24]

Version française : Nathalie Krieg pour Voltairenet.

[1] NDT : Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (Deuxième Chambre des États-Généraux des Pays-Bas, elle correspond à la Chambre basse).

[2] Article en anglais, Martin Enserink, in "Holland, the Public Face of Flu Takes a Hit" (« Hollande, le visage public de la grippe essuie un coup »), Science, 16 octobre 2009, Vol. 326, n° 5951, pp. 350–351 ; DOI : 10.1126/science.326_350b.

[3] NDT : « Sunshine Act », en référence à la dénomination états-unienne des lois concernant la liberté d’information.

[4] Article en anglais, Science, 3 novembre 2009, "Roundup 11/3 The Brink Edition".

[5] Article en néerlandais, "De Farma maffia Deel 1 Osterhaus BV", 28 novembre 2009.

[6] Article en néerlandais, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, "Financiële belangen Osterhaus waren bekend Nieuwsbericht", 30 septembre 2009.

[7] Albert Osterhaus, Commission Européenne, « Recherche ».

[8] Ibid.

[9] Article en anglais, Jane Corbin, Interview with Dr Albert Osterhaus (« Entretien avec le Docteur Albert Osterhaus »), BBC Panorama, 4 octobre 2005.

[10] Article en allemand, Karin Steinberger, "Vogelgrippe : Der Mann mit der Vogelperspektive", Süddeutsche Zeitung, 20 octobre 2005.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Article en allemand, "Schweinegrippe—Geldgieriger Psychopath Auslöser der Pandemie ?", Polskaweb News.

[13] Article en anglais, Ab Osterhaus, "External factors influencing H5N1 mutation/reassortment events with pandemic potential" (« Facteurs externes à fort potentiel pandémique entrant en jeu dans les cas de mutation et de réassortiment du virus H1N1 »), OIE, 7-9 octobre 2008, Vérone, Italie. Téléchargement.

[14] Article en anglais, Health Advisory, Swine Flu Overview, avril 2009.

[15] Article en anglais, Biosurveillance, Swine Flu in Mexico- Timeline of Events, 24 avril 2009.

[16] Cité dans l’article en néerlandais de Louise Voller et Kristian Villesen, "Stærk lobbyisme bag WHO-beslutning om massevaccination", Information, Copenhagen, 15 novembre 2009.

[17] Article en anglais, Jane Bryant, et al, "The One Click Group Response : Prof. David Salisbury Threatens Legal Action" (« Le Professeur David Salisbury répond au groupe One Click par la menace d’une action judiciaire »), 4 mars 2009. Téléchargement.

[18] Prof. David Salisbury cité dans l’article en anglais "Swine flu vaccine to contain axed additive" (« La vaccin anti-grippe A contiendrait un adjuvant retiré du marché »), London Evening Standard et Gulf News, 28 septembre 2009.

[19] Article en allemand, Bert Ehgartner, "Schwindel mit der Schweinegrippe Ist die Aufregung ein Coup der Pharmaindustrie ?"

[20] Tom Jefferson, Entretien avec l’épistémologiste Tom Jefferson : « C’est toute une industrie qui espère une pandémie de grippe », Der Spiegel, 21 juillet 2009.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Article en néerlandais, Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, "Mystisk ændring af WHO’s definition af en pandemi", Copenhagen Information, 15 novembre 2009.

[23] Article en anglais, Rob Stein, "Flu Pandemic Could Be Mild" (« La pandémie de grippe pourrait être modérée »), Washington Post, 8 décembre 2009.

[24] Article en néerlandais "Russland fordert internationale Untersuchung", Polskanet, 5 décembre 2009.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

swine flu: who, laquais of big pharma

http://www.rense.com/general88/megawho.htm

Mega Corruption Scandal At The WHO

By F. William Engdahl

Author of Full Spectrum Dominance:

Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order

12-9-9




WHO's 'Mr Flu' Holland's Albert Osterhaus
has deep ties to pharma industry



The WHO gets more money from private pharma and
related industry sources than from governments



The UK Pharma Giant GlaxoSmithKline is at the heart
of the WHO scandals of influence peddling


The man with the nickname "Dr Flu", Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1.

Earlier this year the Second Chamber of the Netherlands Parliament undertook an investigation into alleged conflicts of interest and financial improprieties of the well-known Dr. Osterhaus. Outside of Holland and the Dutch media, the only note of the sensational investigation into Osterhaus' business affairs came in a tiny note in the respected British magazine, Science.

Osterhaus's credentials and expertise in his field were not in question. What is in question, according to a short report published by the journal Science, are his links to corporate interests that stand to potentially profit from the swine flu pandemic. Science carried the following brief note in its October 16 2009 issue about Osterhaus:

" For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. But last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development.Last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter."

On November 3, 2009 it appeared that Osterhaus emerged with at least the damage somewhat under control. An updated Science blog noted, "The House of Representatives of the Netherlands today rejected a motion asking the government to sever all ties with virologist Albert Osterhaus of Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, who had been accused of conflicts of interest in his role as a government adviser. But Dutch health minister Ab Klink, meanwhile, announced a "Sunshine Act" compelling scientists to disclose their financial ties to companies."

The Minister, Ab Klink, reportedly a personal friend of Osterhaus, subsequently issued a statement on the ministry's website, claiming that Osterhaus was but one of many scientific advisers to the ministry on vaccines for H1N1, and that the Ministry "knew" about the financial interests of Osterhaus. Nothing out of the ordinary, merely pursuit of science and public health, so it seemed.

More careful investigation into the Osterhaus Affair suggests that the world-renowned Dutch Virologist may be at the very center of a multi-billion Euro pandemic fraud which has used human beings in effect as human guinea pigs with untested vaccines and in cases now emerging, resulting in deaths or severe bodily paralysis or injury.

The 'Bird Shit Hoax'

Albert Osterhaus is no small fish. He stands at the global nexus of every major virus panic of the past decade from the mysterious SARS deaths in HongKong, where current WHO Director Margaret Chan got her start in her career as a local health official. According to his official bio at the European Commission, Osterhaus was engaged in April 2003, at the height of the panic over SARS (Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome) in investigation of the Hong Kong outbreak of respiratory illnesses. The EU report states, "he again showed his skill at moving fast to tackle a serious problem. Within three weeks he had proved that the disease was caused by a newly discovered coronavirus that resides in civet cats, other carnivorous animals or bats."

Then Osterhaus moved on as SARS cases vanished from view, this time publicizing dangers of what he claimed was H5N1 Avian Flu. In 1997 he had already began sounding the alarm following the death in Hong Kong of a three-year-old who Osterhaus learned had had direct contact with birds. Osterhaus went into high gear lobbying across Holland and Europe claiming that a deadly new mutation of avian flu had jumped to humans and that drastic measures were required. He claimed to be the first scientist in the world to show that H5N1 could be transferred into humans.
In a BBC interview in October 2005 on the danger of Avian Flu, Osterhaus declared, "if the virus manages indeed to, to mutate itself in such a way that it can transmit from human to human, then we have a completely different situation, we might be at the start of the pandemic." He added, "there is a real chance that this virus could be trafficked by the birds all the way to Europe. There is a real risk, but nobody can estimate the risk at this moment, because we haven't done the experiments." It never did manage to mutate, but he was ready to "do the experiments," presumably for a hefty fee.

To bolster his frightening pandemic scenario, Osterhaus and his lab assistants in Rotterdam began assiduously assembling and freezing samples of, well, bird shit, in an attempt to build a more scientific argument. He claimed that at certain times of the year up to 30% of all European birds acted as carriers of the deadly avian virus, H5N1. He also claimed that farmers working with hens and chickens were then exposed. Osterhaus briefed journalists who dutifully noted his alarm. Politicians were alerted. He wrote papers proposing that the far away deaths in Asia from what he termed H5N1 were coming to Europe, presumably on the wongs or in the innards of deadly sick infected birds. He claimed that migratory birds were carrying the deadly new disease as far west as Rügen and Ukraine. He conveniently ignored the fact that birds do not migrate east to west but rather north to south.

Osterhaus' Avian Flu alarm campaign really took off in 2003 when a Dutch veterinary doctor became ill and died. Osterhaus claimed the death was from H5N1. He convinced the Dutch government to order slaughter of millions of chickens. Yet no other infected persons died from the alleged H5N1. Osterhaus claimed that that was simply proof of the effectiveness of the preemptive slaughter campaign.

Osterhaus claimed that bird feces were the source, via air bombardment or droppings, onto populations and birds below. That was the vehicle for the spread of the deadly new Asian strain of H5N1 he insisted.

There was only one problem with the now voluminous frozen samples of diverse bird excrement he and his associated had collected and frozen at his institute. There was not one single confirmed example of H5N1 virus found in any of his samples. At a May 2006 Congress of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), Osterhaus and his Erasmus colleagues were forced to admit that in testing 100,000 samples of their assiduously saved bird feces, they had discovered not one single case of H5N1 virus.

At a WHO conference in Verona in 2008 titled "Avian influenza at the Human-Animal Interface," in a presentation to scientific colleagues undoubtedly less impressed by appeals to pandemic emotion than the non-scientific public, Osterhaus admitted that "A proper risk assessment of H5N1 as the cause of a new pandemic cannot be made with the currently available information." By then, however, his sights were already firmly on other possible pandemic triggers to focus his vaccination activities.

Swine Flu and WHO corruption

When no mass wave of human deaths from Avian Flu materialized and after Roche, maker of Tamiflu and GlaxoSmithKline had banked billions of dollars in profits from worldwide government stockpiling of their dangerous and reportedly ineffective antiviral drugs, Tamiflu by Roche, and Relenza by GlaxoSmithKline, Osterhaus and other WHO advisers turned to other greener pastures.

By April 2009 their search seemed rewarded as La Gloria, a small Mexican village in Veracruz, reported a case of a small child ill with what had been diagnosed as "Swine Flu" or H1N1. With indecent haste the propaganda apparatus of the World Health Organization in Geneva went into gear with statements from the director-general Dr Margaret Chan, about a possible danger of a global pandemic.

Chan made such irresponsible statements as declaring "a public health emergency of international concern." The further cases of outbreak at La Gloria Mexico were reported on one medical website as, "a 'strange' outbreak of acute respiratory infection, which led to bronchial pneumonia in some pediatric cases. According to a local resident, symptoms included fever, severe cough, and large amounts of phlegm."

Notably those were symptoms which would make sense in terms of the proximity of one of the world's largest pig industrial feeding concentrations at La Gloria owned by Smithfield Farms of the USA. Residents had picketed the Smithfield Farms site in Mexico for months complaining of severe respiratory problems from the fecal waste lagoons. That possible cause of the diseases in La Gloria apparently did not interest Osterhaus and his colleagues advising the WHO. The long-awaited "pandemic" that Osterhaus had predicted ever since his involvement with SARS in the Guandgong Province of China in 2003, was now finally at hand.

On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan of WHO made the declaration of a Phase 6 "Pandemic Emergency" regarding the spread of H1N1 Influenza. Curiously in announcing it, she noted, "On present evidence, the overwhelming majority of patients experience mild symptoms and make a rapid and full recovery, often in the absence of any form of medical treatment." She then added, "Worldwide, the number of deaths is smallwe do not expect to see a sudden and dramatic jump in the number of severe or fatal infections."

It later was learned that Chan acted, following heated debates inside WHO, on the advice of the scientific advisory group of WHO, or SAGE, the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts. One of the members of SAGE at the time and today was Dr. Albert "Mr Flu" Osterhaus.

Not only was Osterhaus in a key position to advocate the panic-inducing WHO "Pandemic emergency" declaration. He was also chairman of the leading private European Scientific Working group on Influenza (ESWI), which describes itself as a "multidisciplinary group of key opinion leaders in influenza [that] aims to combat the impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza." Osterhaus' ESWI is the vital link as they themselves describe it, "between the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva, the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin and the University of Connecticut, USA."

What is more significant about the ESWI is that its work is entirely financed by the same pharma mafia companies that make billions on the pandemic emergency as governments around the world are compelled to buy and stockpile vaccines on declaration of a WHO Pandemic. The funders of ESWI include H1N1 vaccine maker Novartis, Tamiflu distributor, Hofmann-La Roche, Baxter Vaccines, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and others.

Not to lose the point, the world-leading virologist, official adviser on H1N1 to the governments of the UK and Holland, Dr Albert Osterhaus, head of the Department of Virology at the Erasmus Medical College of Rotterdam, also sat on the WHO's elite SAGE and served as chairman at the same time of the pharma industry-sponsored ESWI, which in turn urged dramatic steps to vaccinate the world against the grave danger of a new Pandemic they insisted could rival the feared 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic.

The Wall Street bank, JP Morgan, estimated that in large part as a result of the WHO pandemic decision, the giant pharma firms that also finance Osterhaus' ESWI work, stand to reap some ¤7.5 to ¤10 billion in profits.

A fellow member of WHO's SAGE is Dr Frederick Hayden, of Britain's Wellcome Trust and reportedly a close friend of Osterhaus. Hayden also receives money for "advisory" services from Roche and GlaxoSmithKline among other pharma giants involved in producing products related to the H1N1 panic.

Chairman of WHO's SAGE is another British scientist, Prof. David Salisbury of the UK Department of Health. He also heads the WHO H1N1 Advisory Group. Salisbury is a robust defender of the pharma industry. He has been accused by UK health citizen health group One Click of covering up the proven links between vaccines and an explosive rise in infant autism as well as links between the vaccine Gardasil and palsy and even death.

Then on September 28, 2009 the same Salisbury stated, "There is a very clear view in the scientific community that there is no risk from the inclusion of Thiomersal." The vaccine being used for H1N1 in Britain is primarily produced by GlaxoSmithKlilne. It contains the mercury preservative Thiomersol. Because of growing evidence that Thiomersol in vaccines might be related to autism in children in the United States, in 1999 the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Public Health Service called for it to be removed from vaccines.

Yet another SAGE member at WHO with intimate financial ties to the vaccine makers that benefit from SAGE's recommendations to WHO is Dr. Arnold Monto, a paid consultant to vaccine maker MedImmune, Glaxo and ViroPharma.

Even more, the meetings of the "independent" scientists of SAGE are attended by "observers" who include, yes, the very vaccine producers GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Baxter and company. One might ask if the SAGE are supposed to be the world's leading experts on flu and vaccines, why they would ask the vaccine makers to sit in.

In the past decade the WHO, in order to boost funds at its disposal entered into what it calls "public private partnerships." Instead of receiving its funds solely from member United Nations governments as its original purpose had been, WHO today receives almost double its normal UN budget in the form of grants and financial support from private industry. The industry? The very drug and vaccine makers who benefit from decisions like the June 2009 H1N1 Pandemic emergency declaration. As the main financiers of the WHO bureaucracy, naturally the Pharma Mafia and their friends receive what has been called "open door red carpet treatment" in Geneva.

In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:

"one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.

SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?

Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...

When asked if the WHO had deliberately declared the Pandemic Emergency in order to create a huge market for H1N1 vaccines and drugs, Jefferson replied,

"Don't you think there's something noteworthy about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic? The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn't have immunity, and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two have been dropped, and that's how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic."

Conveniently enough, the WHO published the new Pandemic definition in April 2009 just in time to allow WHO, on advice of SAGE and others like Albert "Dr Flu" Osterhaus and David Salisbury, to declare the mild cases of flu dubbed H1N1 Influenza A to be declared Pandemic Emergency.

In a relevant footnote, the Washington Post on December 8 in an article on the severity, or lack of same, of the world H1N1 "pandemic" reported that, "with the second wave of H1N1 infections having crested in the United States, leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting influenza outbreaks."

Russian Parliamentarian and chairman of the Duma Health Committee, Igor Barinow has called on the Russian Representative to WHO in Geneva to order an official investigation into the growing evidence of massive corruption of the WHO by the pharmaceutical industry. "There are grave accusations of corruption within the WHO," said Barinow. "An international commission of inquiry is urgently required."

Endnotes

Martin Enserink, In Holland, the Public Face of Flu Takes a Hit,
Science, 16 October 2009:
Vol. 326. no. 5951, pp. 350 ­ 351; DOI: 10.1126/science.326_350b.


Science, November 3, 2009, Roundup 11/3 The Brink Edition, accessed on
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/panay.jpg
&imgrefurl=http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/11/roundup-113-the.html&usg=___
pt_M2p5uuWJw2outvX-U8SbR9E=&h=168&w=250&sz=21&hl=en&start=3&tbnid=MnfYxYJ9Q_
EqPM:&tbnh=75&tbnw=111&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dalbert%2Bosterhaus%2Bscience
%2Bmagazine%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den.


Article from Dutch, De Farma maffia Deel 1 Osterhaus BV, 28 november 2009, accessed in
http://hetonderzoek.blogspot.com/2009/11/de-farma-maffia-deel1-osterhaus-bv.html.


Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, Financiële belangen Osterhaus waren bekend
Nieuwsbericht, 30 september 2009, accessed in
http://www.minvws.nl/nieuwsberichten/pg/2009/osterhaus.asp.


European Commission, "Research", Dr Albert Osterhaus, accessed in
http://ec.europa.eu/research/profiles/index_en.cfm?p=1_osterhaus.
Ibid.


Jane Corbin, Interview with Dr Albert Osterhaus, BBC Panorama, 4 October, 2005.


Karin Steinberger, Vogelgrippe: Der Mann mit der Vogelperspektive, Seuddeutsche Zeitung, 20 October, 2005, accessed in
"http://www.seuddeutsche.de" www.seuddeutsche.de panorama/8/373818/text/.
Ibid.


Schweinegrippe-Geldgieriger Psychopath Auslöser der Pandemie?, accessed in
http://polskaweb.eu/vater-der-neuen-grippen-wahrscheinlich-wahnsinnig-673756422645.html.


Ab Osterhaus, External factors influencing H5N1 mutation/reassortment events with pandemic potential, OIE, 7-9 October 2008, Verona, Italy, accessed in
http://www.oie.int/eng/info_ev/en_verone.htm.


WHO Health Advisory, April 2009, accessed in HYPERLINK "http://www.swine-flu-vaccine.info/" http://www.swine-flu-vaccine.info/.


Biosurveillance, Swine Flu in Mexico- Timeline of Events, April 24, 2009, accessed in
http://biosurveillance.typepad.com/biosurveillance/2009/04/swine-flu-in-mexico-timeline-of-events.html.


Cited in Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, Stærk lobbyisme bag WHO-beslutning om massevaccination , Information, Copenhagen, 15 November 2009 accessed in http://www.information.dk/215355.


Jane Bryant, et al, The One Click Group Response: Prof. David Salisbury Threatens Legal Action, 4 March, 2009, accessed in
http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/vaccines/
David%20Salisbury%20Threatens%20One%20Click.pdf.


Prof. David Salisbury cited in, Swine flu vaccine to contain axed additive, London Evening Standard, 28 September 2009, accessed in .
http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/printArticle.asp?cu_no=2&item
_no=316888&version=1&template_id=38&parent_id=20


Bert Ehgartner, Schwindel mit der Schweinegrippe Ist die Aufregung ein Coup der Pharmaindustrie? Accessed in
http://www.profil.at/articles/0944/560/254615/schwindel-
schweinegrippe-ist-aufregung-coup-pharmaindustrie.


Tom Jefferson, Interview with Epidemiologist Tom Jefferson: 'A Whole Industry Is Waiting For A Pandemic' Der Spiegel, 21 July 2009, accessed in
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,637119,00.html.

Ibid.


Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, Mystisk ændring af WHO's definition af en pandemi,Copenhagen Information, 15 November 2009, accessed in
http://www.information.dk/215341.


Rob Stein, Flu Pandemic Could Be Mild, Washington Post, December 8, 2009.


Polskanet, Russland fordert internationale Untersuchung, 5 December 2009, accessed in

http://polskaweb.eu/vater-der-neuen-grippen-wahrscheinlich-wahnsinnig-673756422645.html